News Room


DATE: February 3, 2003

PUBLICATION: Philippine Inquirer

TITLE: Breakthrough

AUTHOR: Conrado de Quiros

WHILE the votes in the German polls were being counted last September, everyone kept commenting on TV that it set a record for the longest time before the winner was known. The reason for it was that Gerhardt Schroeder and Edmund Stoiber were battling each other neck and neck. The polls closed at 5 p.m. and hours later, they still could not establish a definite trend. It was only around midnight that they did, the Schroeder's red-green coalition pulling through by the narrowest of margins and forcing Stoiber to concede.

That was the second thing that bowled me over about the German elections -- the first was that they could not comprehend the concept of cheating -- which was that they could not comprehend the concept of a winner in elections being known days or even weeks or months later. Their concept of a record delay was seven hours! The winner was normally known a couple of hours after the polling stations closed.

That of course is unheard of in this country. Courtesy of the ballot box, which entails a cumbersome registration and verification process, the physical transportation of the votes to the counting centers, and their being read one by one, the winners could only be known after many a sleepless night. And only after the place was littered with corpses from people trying to attack and defend the ballot boxes.

I've always argued for junking the ballot box on the very basic ground that delay equals cheating. That is an obvious equation. Any process that is as cumbersome as this will invite cheating as resolutely as anyone wearing the sign "I love Arabs" will invite mayhem in Jerusalem. Of course it will also invite acts of bravery or heroism, like the spectacle of public school teachers embracing the ballot boxes and risking death -- or finding it -- to protect them from goons. But the net effect is unsavory, the nation ending up being the most victimized by it.

Consequently, I've always plugged for the modernization of the electoral process, and have railed against the inability of the Comelec to do so. Luzviminda Tangcanco in particular may not escape blame for it. But comes now a group that has developed a system that stands not just to modernize Philippine elections but to revolutionize them altogether. That is the MegaGroup of Computer Companies headed by Rafael Garcia III. They've devised an electronic system that covers the entire range of the voting process, from registration, to voting, to counting, to recounting, and makes voting a veritable joy.

They call it Botong Pinoy.

They made a demonstration last week at the Ateneo de Naga, and the results were awesome. The system to begin with makes it impossible for anyone to register twice, removing the bane of flying voters completely. Registration entails having yourself photographed digitally and pressing your left and right thumb on a box.

The actual voting is not unlike going to a Metrobank ATM. A teleprompter verbally advises you what to do. You can choose whatever language you want from a list by touching the screen. Then you just keep touching "Next" after you've finished a page. The beauty of it is that the pictures of the candidates are displayed on the screen along with their names. All you have to do, for example, when voting for senators, is to touch their pictures and they are automatically listed down. If you don't want to vote for all 12 senators, you can always press "Next" after you're through. That is true for all the candidates down to the lowest local level.

The counting is instantaneous. The votes are sent automatically to the central system as soon as they are made. The system can count a million votes in a second, so all it takes to count 40 million voters is 40 seconds! That eliminates completely dagdag-bawas, where people add or erase zeroes from the physical tallies.

As an added precaution, the votes will be backed up by a computer printout with a barcode to make sure it is the only one of its kind. You can always ask for a copy of your vote, making it impossible for a candidate you voted for in your district to register a zero in the tally. You have proof of it.

I tried the system myself. I became the guinea pig in the demonstration at the Ateneo de Naga. Registration took all of two minutes. Part of the reason for it is that I am reasonably computer literate, and more importantly do not have a fear of technology, which can be a problem for other people. But I will come to that later on. My picture was taken, I pressed my thumbprints on the box, and filled up the usual data sheet-name, date of birth, place of birth, etc. That was it, I was now a registered voter. I was ready to vote.

The teleprompter asked me what language of instruction I wanted, and I chose English. After pressing "Next," the pictures of some ten presidential candidates with their names below appeared on the screen. A wild applause erupted behind me when I touched the picture of Raul Roco. Next the vice president and then the senators. I chose only five senators and pressed "Next." The teleprompter asked me if I had closed my votes at five, and touched the "Yes" box. Again, I took only all of two minutes. I would imagine someone less familiar with the technology, or more intimidated by it, might take longer.

Now, here's the fun part. They asked me to register again, and I did. The computer said sorry, there was already another person by that name and thumbprint. I understand that in another demo someone registered a second time without glasses and wearing a fake mustache. Same response: there was no getting around the thumbprints. I tried voting twice as well, upon instructions. The computer answered in a flash: "You have already voted. "

Impressive as hell. (To be concluded)




 
 
 
Copyright 2006 Mega Data Corporation. Website by User Imagination